Intelligence you can count on

The official FPinfomart blog.

Posts Tagged ‘Search’

Monitoring TOPICS: keyword lists are SO yesterday

Posted by Jennifer Stein on November 21, 2011

Few sentences in the field of media monitoring fill me with more dread than this one:  “Here is the list of keywords we want to monitor.”

It’s usually followed by a copied-and pasted list, or an attached Word document containing an unstructured or bulleted stream of terms, in no particular order (or worse, sorted alphabetically).

I’ve learned a LOT of things about a lot of industries in the many years I’ve worked in this business.  I know what shale gas and fracking are (no, I’m not swearing at you!)  I know that monitoring Canadian air transportation news requires the exclusion of mentions of the “Air Canada Centre.”  I can help you monitor for just about any topic you can describe to me.

But that’s the key – media monitoring is about TOPICS, not keywords.  And you need to be able to describe the purpose and intent of a topic.

Of course, keywords are a part of that.  Any topic will have keywords as the basis for monitoring.  But within your keyword list, some things belong together.  They may be related concepts, whose mentions all belong under the same topic heading.  And for other keywords, not every mention may be relevant.  There might be qualifiers – only show me mentions of this word when this other word is also present.  Or exclude mentions of this keyword if they’re in the same story as another word.

Setting up your media monitoring topics requires a bit of reverse-engineering.  What is the intended final product of your monitoring?  Is it a daily media brief, distributed to a group of users in your company?  Is it an analytical report, comparing coverage of issues (topics), or over time?  The structure of this end product will help you decide on your topics.

Only after you’ve decided on the topics you wish to monitor is it time to start thinking about keywords.  You could brainstorm a big list of words and phrases, and then sort them by the topics you’d already decided to monitor.  Or you could look at each of these topic lists and come up with keywords and phrases that would generate relevant hits on each one.  You’ll likely do a little bit of both.  You’ll also likely find that some of your keywords belong to more than one topic – and that’s ok.  And, furthermore, it’s very possible that some of your topics even have sub-topics – i.e. it may take more than one type of search to fully define an issue.

If you’ve already got a keyword list in your possession, don’t panic – it can start as a jumping-off point to your transition to monitoring topics.  The illustration below shows a keyword list transformed into a topics list.  You can also use our topic monitoring worksheet [Word document] as a resource to help you organize your thoughts.  The sample here is filled in for a fictional client, to give you an idea of how you might use this worksheet.

A keyword list transformed into a Topic list

A keyword list transformed into a Topic list

You’ll notice that in some cases, our topics are simple list of keywords.   In other cases, the topics share the starting point of mentions of “recycling” and add additional qualifiers.  This allows our results to filter naturally into specific sets of results.  Within FPinfomart, each of these topics would translate to a Personal Profile.

Need help turning your keyword list into a topic list?  Are your Personal Profiles to broad, or too narrow?  Do you have several Profiles searching individual keywords that could be combined into topics?  Our customer service team can help!

Posted in General, Tips | Tagged: , | Comments Off

Follow-up post: Less than .17% Of Google searches used ‘+’ correctly; new feature launched

Posted by Jennifer Stein on November 16, 2011

Earlier this week, I wrote about Google’s discontinuation of the + operator, and the fact that despite my initial alarm at its disappearance, that operator didn’t work the way I thought it did.

Turns out I wasn’t alone.

According to Techcrunch, less than 0.17% of users were using Google’s + operator correctly anyway.  However, Google has now introduced a new feature, called “Verbatim” which does exactly what it sounds like – returns results based on EXACTLY what you type in the search box.  No synonyms or other intelligent analysis of your query.

You can access the verbatim search tool under “More search tools” on the left-hand side of the Google page.

Verbatim Tool

The "Verbatim" tool is located on the left side of a Google search results set. Under the header of "All Search Results," click "More Search Tools" to expand the menu to include Verbatim.

Read TechCrunch’s original article, here:

Google: Less Than .17% Of Searches Used ‘+’ Correctly, But Here’s Verbatim | TechCrunch.

Posted in Search | Tagged: , , , | Comments Off

Expert search syntax: Google has it, FPinfomart has it – do YOU have it?

Posted by Jennifer Stein on November 14, 2011

When I read recently that Google was discontinuing the availability of the + operator, of which I was a regular user, I was alarmed.  How else would I require a search term to appear in my results (rather than letting Google give me back what IT thought I was searching for)?  At least, that’s what I thought was happening when I used the + operator.

But wait.  According to Google “Search Anthropologist” Daniel M. Russell, I’d had it wrong all along:

Here’s the deal: LOTS of people believed incorrectly that the + operator was the opposite of the – operator. You know what – does, it excludes the term from the search results. That is, if you do a search like [apples –macintosh] the results will not contain the term macintosh in the results. That makes sense. (Some places use the NOT operator for this. Same behavior.)

Unfortunately, many people believed that a search like [apples +macintosh] would require the term to be in the search results. That’s NOT what it did. While the + term would usually be in the results, it was only there because you’d put it into the query!

So what did the + do? Answer: It turned off synonymization and spell-correction. That is, with a query like [apples +macintosh] you wouldn’t get that term macintosh being synonymized for a term like gala, gravenstein or jonathan. (Those are other apple varieties, if you’re wondering.)

The + operator wasn’t forcing my keyword to appear in the query; it was merely removing Google’s ability to generalize it – i.e. excluding synonyms and stemming.  Double-quotation marks are taking over this functionality in Google.  In fact, Russell’s article goes on to describe some other very cool things you can do with double quotes.

I’ve just swallowed a big dose of my very own medicine.  Our Training team spends lots of very valuable time teaching our users the nuances of our Expert search syntax, and the message we always try to convey is that learning it makes you a better searcher.  A POWER searcher!

Every system has its unique syntax.  To get the best possible results, it’s worth the investment to thoroughly research the “expert” features of the search systems you use.

Are you curious about FPinfomart’s Expert Search syntax?  Need a refresher?  Want to get more precise search results? Contact our training team to set up an appointment for an in-depth look at Expert Search on FPinfomart.

Posted in Search | Tagged: , , , , | Comments Off

Shortcut Shocker: 90 Percent of People Don’t Know How to Use CTRL+F

Posted by Jennifer Stein on October 19, 2011

A recent article on The Atlantic cited a study by Google Anthropologist Dan Russell which showed that 90% of users don’t know how to use the Ctrl-F function.

If you’re one of those 90%, you may not know that the keyboard shortcut Ctrl-F, in almost any Web browser (and, incidentally, most other applications including Word & Excel), brings your cursor to a small search box which allows you to type in a word or phrase – and if that word or phrase appears in the web page you’re currently viewing, it will be highlighted on your screen.  You can usually use buttons provided beside the “find in page” search box to move forward and backward to the next or previous mention of your searched word or phrase.

“90 percent of the US Internet population does not know that. This is on a sample size of thousands,” Russell said. “I do these field studies and I can’t tell you how many hours I’ve sat in somebody’s house as they’ve read through a long document trying to find the result they’re looking for. At the end I’ll say to them, ‘Let me show one little trick here,’ and very often people will say, ‘I can’t believe I’ve been wasting my life!’” [Via The Atlantic]

Like many of the other sites that cited this story (and another (Mozilla) who contributed similar evidence to this discussion), I was genuinely astounded by this statistic.  As a heavy web content consumer, it would be next-to-impossible to get through a day without using Ctrl-F.  If I’m seeking a specific piece of information on a text-heavy website, I can’t even begin to imagine the amount of time it would take to locate it if I had to scan manually through all of the content.

Although Ctrl-F is an everyday shortcut for me, perhaps there are other “obvious” browsing tools that may not be so obvious to everyone.  Have you had an “aha” moment about a simple tool you know have adopted into regular use?  Have you had to teach someone (a colleague? Relative?) about Ctrl-F or something similar?  I’d be curious to hear your experiences – hit the comments!

Control-F functionality screenshot

Ctrl-F functionality in Firefox. Most browsers work the same way with slight differences in location of the "Find in Page" box.

Posted in General | Tagged: , , , | Comments Off

Flashback Week: Narrowing your Personal Profile results – Part 1 – Keyword strategies

Posted by Jennifer Stein on March 8, 2011

I’m away this week, so I thought I’d take the opportunity to repost some of my favourite entries from the Archives of this blog. This post originally ran on February 9, 2010.

There are as many ways to use FPinfomart.ca as we have customers, but there’s no escaping the fact that Personal Profiles are a fundamental tool in Media Monitoring. For many of us, one of the issues we face is navigating that very fine line between ensuring we are aware of all relevant coverage, and getting so many hits that we are overwhelmed by sheer volume of information.

When it comes to Personal Profiles, there are two key strategies in fine-tuning your results to include as much relevant content as possible, while excluding less-relevant items. We’ll address each of these in a two-part series. Today, we’ll look at using keywords to get relevant hits. Tomorrow’s post will focus on source selection strategies.

Profile Title vs. Keywords

One of the most common “rookie mistakes” we see customers make is entering keywords in the Profile Name box, and leaving the keywords box blank. The Profile Title is simply a name you give each Profile to be able to distinguish one Profile from another (don’t forget, you can have up to 100 separate Profiles in your account!)

Profile Title vs. Keyword box

Make sure you use the Profile Name box to give your Profile a title. The title you place in this box is NOT searched. Keywords or phrases you wish to search belong in the next 3 boxes, but at least ONE keyword must be entered in the "Match Stories..." box.

Synonyms, concepts, and alternate spellings

As mentioned in the previous section, after the title, the only other mandatory box on the Profile form is the one labeled “Match stories that mention ANY of these phrases…” Use this box to enter the words or phrases you wish to search for, with one per line (hit enter after each word or phrase). Do not use any quotes, Boolean operators (such as or, and, or not), or any other search syntax here. I like to call this a “what you type is what you get” box.

Once you’ve selected the focus of your Profile, do a little brainstorming. What words or phrases would you expect to appear in news articles (or TV broadcasts – more about that later) about this topic? What are some of the synonyms for those words? Are there other ways of referring to an individual? Who are all the players in the industry? Are acronyms or nicknames ever used? Some examples to consider are shown in the following screen shots.

List all members of a list separately.

Make sure to include nicknames and variations of acronyms.

When your keyword is a name, consider variant spellings, titles, and middle names.

When creating a Profile that will include Television content, make sure to consider common mis-spellings of your keywords. Since TV monitoring relies on the closed-captioning of programs, it is wise to take into account potential phonetic spellings of less common words, names, and other ways keywords may be transcribed by a captioner who is in a hurry or unfamiliar with the topic of discussion.

A Series of Sieves

a series of sievesI like to think of the three keyword boxes on the Profiles form as a series of sieves, each with a finer mesh than the one above. The articles in our database represent the material to be sorted, and your keywords make up the sieves. The first (“Match Stories…”) keyword box is the sieve with the largest holes. Any stories that make it through to the second sieve can then be filtered again by the second keyword box, the one labeled “And Require…” Any material left after this second filtering can then be passed through the third sieve with the smallest holes, the “But Exclude…” keyword box.

There are times when using only that first sieve is appropriate. When you want to retrieve every single article that mentions your company name, you’ll use only the first “Match Stories” box, and leave the others blank. But perhaps you wish to subdivide your topic, or only retrieve articles that not only mention an organization, but also mention keywords describing a particular aspect of that organization. If that’s the case, you’ll want to employ at least one of your finer-meshed sieves as well.

Choosing a Narrow Topic

It is best to search the narrowest possible topic with each Profile. That doesn’t mean you should use only one keyword. There may be multiple keywords required to describe your topic (see the section on synonyms, above), however the narrower your aim, the more precise your results may be. For example, create one Profile for your company name and/or its spokespeople; one for your competitors; and a third for your products, and another for regulatory bodies related to your industry. You may end up with two or more similar Profiles – for example, one for Mergers & Acquisitions in your industry, and a second for new hires in your industry.

Following are three examples of similar but separate Profiles. It would be overwhelming to create a GENERAL Profile that retrieved every article that mentioned any of Canada’s major banks. But perhaps there are specific aspects of the banking industry we’re interested in tracking. We would create a separate Profile for each “sub-topic.” The keywords in the “Match Stories…” box might be the same (or very similar), while the keywords we use to create the second and third sieves (the “And Require” and “But Exclude” boxes) will vary.

Canadian Banks Profile 1

Where are you looking?

Where in story? There is a drop-down menu to the right of each keyword which will help you specify exactly where in an article we should look for your keywords or phrases.

Search “Anywhere in Story” for the broadest possible search. Restrict your search to “Headline or Lead” to narrow your results to only articles focused on your particular keywords. Select “Byline” with a keyword of a journalist’s name to find articles written only by a certain individual. The narrowest possible search is to restrict your search to “Headline” only, which would retrieve an article only if your keyword(s) appeared in the title.

Filter it

We offer several checkboxes on the right of the Profiles form that allow you to narrow your results by eliminating certain content types.

  • The Editorials filter excludes any article whose story type is classified as an Editorial.
  • The Letters to the Editor filter excludes any article whose story type is classified as a Letter to the Editor.
  • The Sports filter excludes any article which originated in the Sports section of the newspaper.
  • The Arts, Life, Homes, Food filter excludes any article which originated in the Arts, Life, Homes and Food sections of the newspaper.
  • The News Briefs filter eliminates columns of short news summaries, where the title or headline of the column is ‘News Briefs.’
  • The Stock Market Summaries filter eliminates lists of stock market results.
  • The Caption Only filter excludes any item which has no story text. For example, the caption of photos or other images that ran without an accompanying article.
  • The CP Wire in papers filter excludes articles whose source is CP Wire (Canadian Press). This allows you to cut down on duplicate results. This Filter will NOT exclude the original CP Wire articles. It only eliminates those versions printed in newspapers.
  • The Obituaries filter excludes Obituaries and death notices.

A moving target

What’s important today may be yesterday’s news tomorrow. New spokespeople are hired; new products are introduced, and others fall by the wayside. Competitors come and go, and campaigns have discrete start and end points. You can always delete obscure Profiles, and edit existing ones to tailor your keywords to match what’s relevant now.

edit & delete buttons

Keep up with changing priorities - Edit or Delete Profiles as needed.

Coming tomorrow – Part 2 – Source Selection Strategies

I hope you’ve stuck with me through this lengthy tour of the many strategies you can use to optimize your Profile results with your keywords. Come back tomorrow for part 2 of this series – using source selection to narrow your results to those relevant to you.

Posted in Tips | Tagged: , , | Comments Off

FPinfomart Scavenger Hunt: All in the Family

Posted by Jennifer Stein on February 18, 2011

The rules: the first person to enter the correct answer in this post’s comments will be declared the winner. Please follow the answer format below so that we know you’ve used FPinfomart to find your answer!

This coming Monday is the Family Day holiday in 5 provinces.  Alberta was the first to enact this holiday scheduled for the 3rd Monday each February.

What is the first mention you can find in the press of a Family Day holiday in Alberta?A family in a minivan

  1. Give a citation for the mention you found (headline, publication name, date)
  2. During what speech was this proposal given?
  3. Who was the Premier at the time?

Posted in Scavenger Hunt | Tagged: , | Comments Off

FPinfomart Scavenger Hunt: Valentine’s Edition

Posted by Jennifer Stein on February 11, 2011

The rules: the first person to enter the correct answer in this post’s comments will be declared the winner. Please follow the answer format below so that we know you’ve used FPinfomart to find your answer!

In case you haven’t got the Hallmark fever yet, just a gentle reminder that Valentine’s Day is this coming Monday.  Will you be giving cards, flowers and chocolate to anyone?

Find a statistic expressing, in dollars, how much is spent in either Canada or the U.S. on Valentine’s Day-related purchases.A heart-shaped candy box

  1. How much, and what country?
  2. Provide a citation for your answer (headline, publication name, date).
  3. (bonus) What are you giving for Valentine’s Day this year?  What do you hope to get?

Posted in Scavenger Hunt | Tagged: , | Comments Off

Back To Basics: Session 4 – Working With FPinfomart’s Archives

Posted by Jennifer Stein on February 10, 2011

The fourth entry in our Back to Basics series is on the topic of FPinfomart’s Archives.  While the presentation provides some instruction on searching the Simple, Advanced, and Expert interfaces for Archives, it also provides some interesting usage cases for Archives, as well as tips, tricks, and practice exercises.

If you enjoy the flexing your Archive searching muscles, you may wish to browse our weekly Scavenger Hunt.  New challenges are posted every Friday.

Working with FPinfomart’s Archives [PDF]

back to basics

Posted in Back to Basics | Tagged: , , , , | Comments Off

FPinfomart Scavenger Hunt: The Snowpocalypse is (not) upon us

Posted by Jennifer Stein on February 4, 2011

The rules: the first person to enter the correct answer in this post’s comments will be declared the winner. Please follow the answer format below so that we know you’ve used FPinfomart to find your answer!

Both Canada and the US have been hit with several huge snowstorms this winter and last.  The media has jumped on the meteorological bandwagon and come up with increasingly outrageous nicknames for these predicted storms – such as “snowpocalypse,” “snowmaggedon,” and “SnowtoriousB.I.G.”

Search FPinfomart for a snowstorm nickname (other than those mentioned above), from the past 2 years.Snowpocalypse T-shirt

  1. What was the snowstorm nickname you found?
  2. What city or region was it predicted to hit?
  3. Give a citation for your answer (headline,  publication name, date).
  4. Bonus:  How many centimeters (or inches if from the US) of snow actually fell during this event?

Posted in Scavenger Hunt | Tagged: , | Comments Off

FPinfomart Scavenger Hunt: Inspired by the Oscars

Posted by Jennifer Stein on January 28, 2011

The rules: the first person to enter the correct answer in this post’s comments will be declared the winner. Please follow the answer format below so that we know you’ve used FPinfomart to find your answer!

The Oscar nominees were announced this week, and “The King’s Speech” was the clear leader with 12 nominations, including its lead actor, Colin Firth.  Mr. Firth has found critical acclaim in the past.  Locate a review of one of his previous films (NOT “The King’s Speech”). An Oscar statue.

  1. What film was reviewed in the article you found?
  2. What was the reviewer’s opinion of Mr. Firth’s performance?
  3. What was the reviewer’s opinion of the film as a whole?
  4. Give a citation for your answer (headline, publication name, and date).
  5. (bonus) – if you’ve seen this film, do you concur with the reviewer?

Posted in Scavenger Hunt | Tagged: , | Comments Off

 
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 84 other followers